OTTAWA - An international think-tank warns that
poverty among Canadian seniors is on the rise and that current pension safety
nets may be inadequate to address the problem.
The comprehensive study on global pensions by the
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development showed that Canadians
over 65 years of age are relatively well off when compared with most others in
the 34-country group of advanced economies.
For example, the average poverty rate for the group
in Canada was 7.2 per cent during the study period, among the 10 lowest in the
OECD and better than the 12.8 per cent average.
But the report also points to gaps in the Canadian
situation.
For instance, as poverty rates were falling in many
OECD countries between 2007 and 2010, in Canada they rose about two percentage
points.
As well, the report notes that public (government)
transfers to seniors in Canada account for less than 39 per cent of the gross
income of Canadian seniors, compared with the OECD average of 59 per cent,
meaning more Canadians depend on workplace pensions to bridge the gap.
Meanwhile, public spending on pensions in Canada
represents 4.5 per cent of the country's economic output, compared with and
OECD average of 7.8 per cent.
Canadian seniors depend on income from private
pensions and other capital for about 42 per cent of their total.
"As private pensions are mainly concentrated
among workers with higher earnings, the growing importance of private provision
in the next decades may lead to higher income inequality among the
elderly," the report warns.
"Those facing job insecurity and interrupted
careers are also more exposed to the risk of poverty because of the lower
amounts they can devote to retirement savings."
The report notes that rising poverty among Canadian
seniors, although still relatively low, is most acute among elderly women,
especially those who are divorced or separated.
"Higher poverty among older women reflects
lower wages, more part-time work and careers gaps during women's working
lives," the report said while also noting "the effect of longer
female life expectancy ... for which many women have not been able to save
enough."
The OECD says Canada's current pension support,
both private and public, replaces only about 45 per cent of average
pre-retirement gross income, well below the two-thirds that may experts
recommend.
Among lower income Canadians, however, the
replacement rate is 80 per cent.
Some provinces, particularly Ontario and Prince
Edward Island, have been putting pressure on the federal government to move
ahead with expanding the Canada Pension Plan which, along with Old Age
Security, represents the main source of public transfers to seniors in the
country.
But federal Finance Minister Jim Flaherty has so
far rejected the approach, saying the economy is not strong enough to withstand
the added premiums on firms and individuals expansion would entail.
Last year, the federal government also cut back on
the OAS program by raising the age of eligibility to 67 from 65 effective in
2023.
Canada's approach is not unusual, however. The
report notes that following the 2008-09 crisis, pension reform has been
widespread throughout the OECD, with many moving to a higher retirement age of
67.
"Some countries have gone even further, moving
to 68 or 69 years, though no other country has gone as far as the Czech
Republic, which decided on an open-ended increase of the pension age by two
months per year," the OECD adds.
Another innovation being adopted by some countries is
tying future benefits with demographic and economic growth projections. The OECD notes that many if not all countries are
facing challenges with aging population, slow economic growth and governmental
fiscal concerns.
Vancouver Sun
No comments:
Post a Comment