A
new report released by CIBC World Markets found that a U.S.-style housing
meltdown is not likely to occur in Canada. Benjamin Tal, deputy chief economist
at CIBC argues that there are fundamental differences that set the Canadian
market apart from the U.S. market.
While
many economists have pointed to record high levels of Canadian debt, Tal argues
that the debt-to-income ratio in Canada is not a “serious analytical tool.” A
number of countries with comparably higher debt-to-income ratios than Canada
did not experience a housing meltdown as the U.S. did. Rather, Tal proposes,
Canadians should consider the speed at which the debt-to-income ratio has been
growing. Over the past three years, the debt-to-income ratio in Canada has been
rising at half the speed than the rate at which the debt-to-income ratio rose
in the U.S. in the three years leading up to the housing crash.
Strong
growth in indebtedness in the U.S. was partially fueled by speculative activity
in the housing market. Tal argues we have seen far less of this in the Canadian
market. Furthermore, in the decade leading up to the crash housing starts in
the U.S. exceeded household formation by nearly 80 per cent. On average in
Canada over the past decade this gap has only been 10 per cent.
Another
key difference between Canada and the U.S. is in the quality of mortgages. The
distribution of credit scores has not changed drastically in the past four
years in Canada. Whereas in the four years leading up to the recession in the
U.S., the proportion in the “risky category” rose by more than 10 per cent and
made up 22 per cent of the overall market.
In
the U.S. in 2006, non-prime mortgages accounted for no less than 33 per cent of
originations and close to 20 per cent of outstanding mortgages. One third of
mortgages taken out in the U.S. in 2005 and 2006, before the drop in prices,
were in negative equity position. No less than half had less than five per cent
equity making them highly exposed to even a modest decline in prices.
In
Canada however, the negative equity position is zero and only 15-20 per cent of
new originations have an equity position of less than 15 per cent. Tal
estimates that the non-conforming market is currently at around seven per cent
of mortgage outstanding, which is well below the over 20 per cent seen in the
U.S. before the crash.
The
reset of no less than $2 trillion of mortgage debt in 2006 and 2007 was no
doubt the trigger to the U.S. housing crash. Such a potential trigger does not
exist in Canada with mortgage rates likely to rise gradually, which will allow
borrowers to adjust over time.
The
recent slowing in sales activity will likely be followed by price adjustments
across the country. However, the Canada of today is very different than a
pre-recession U.S. Tal’s argument is compelling. Fears of a U.S.-style of
meltdown happening in Canada tend to oversimplify the current state of the
Canadian housing market.
No comments:
Post a Comment